The ability to try new things certainly becomes harder as you get older because you already know who you are but with a new perspective it can get easier
This is circular reasoning “Well it has to be this way because the Bible said it’s this way, and according to the Bible, the Bible is correct so therefore if your source isn’t the Bible it’s wrong”
This comment I’m replying to is a scammer, If you pay me 50 dollars I will kick him in the nuts and get you 10k from him and 9k from the original scammer
Even that could be doubted as some elaborate prank or group hallucination. When your burden of proof is “beyond a shadow of a doubt”, you’ll never come to any belief, regardless if it is true or not.
Notice how this is self-refuting: How do I know that what you wrote is also similarly inaccurate? Epistemological skepticism is self-refuting. The other issue is that this doesn't reckon with the character of God: A good God isn't in the business of deceiving His servants.
In the matter of infinite time, everything that can happen will happen, granted this assumes time is infinite, which we will probably never know because we are entirely subject to the flow of time, our understanding of a universe without time is very obsolete
Everyone will be forgotten, even extremely famous/infamous people like Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Ghengis Khan, Adolf Hitler, Michael Jackson, Lebron James
I’m not sure I get your point. If I don’t see the Bible (I’m guessing you’re talking about New Testament) as the infallible word of God, then I’m less likely to have consistent/convincing arguments? Or, I’m blinded from consistent/convincing arguments?
The ability to try new things certainly becomes harder as you get older because you already know who you are but with a new perspective it can get easier
Generally it’s harmless, people develop crushes all the time, they come and go, there’s nothing wrong with that
Yes adults get nightmares and yes sometimes they can be troubling.
IMAGINE COSPLAYING AS THE GOVERNMENT LOL
I’m sorry, but has all of the symptoms of a narcissistic abusive parent.
Ah a fellow Theramintrees viewer I presume
[удалено]
This is circular reasoning “Well it has to be this way because the Bible said it’s this way, and according to the Bible, the Bible is correct so therefore if your source isn’t the Bible it’s wrong”
Did they make an offer that you pay them $20 for a Christmas card that was signed by [Insert famous person here]?
AutoModerator has been summoned to explain
If you send me $50, I’ll make sure you get all your money back, matter a fact I’ll stack on another $9K, sounds like a deal doesn’t it?
This comment I’m replying to is a scammer, If you pay me 50 dollars I will kick him in the nuts and get you 10k from him and 9k from the original scammer
I’ll prove to you I’m not scammer… first I need a balance of at least $200
Even that could be doubted as some elaborate prank or group hallucination. When your burden of proof is “beyond a shadow of a doubt”, you’ll never come to any belief, regardless if it is true or not.
But an omniscient deity would undoubtedly know the most elaborate plan to convince people
Why do people believe in free will? Like what do they gain if we do have free will and what do they lose if we don’t have free will?
If any of this is true - for the sake of argument - how would one support it? Without a God to tell us? (Especially the first one?)
The problem with empty claims with no evidence is that they can literally take on any form
I think TOS should be optional without risk of service, like you can still use the service at a higher payment if you don’t want to agree to TOS
Notice how this is self-refuting: How do I know that what you wrote is also similarly inaccurate? Epistemological skepticism is self-refuting. The other issue is that this doesn't reckon with the character of God: A good God isn't in the business of deceiving His servants.
What he said is more so circular reasoning rather than self-refutation
[удалено]
Most will claim that the universe had a beginning therefore needs a creator
In the matter of infinite time, everything that can happen will happen, granted this assumes time is infinite, which we will probably never know because we are entirely subject to the flow of time, our understanding of a universe without time is very obsolete
Regular salesperson? Adaptive.
I think a strong one for longevity is believing in what you sell
Or instead of finding constructive meaning in society, build one for yourself
I have a question for OP. Is it more important that your beliefs are useful, or that they are true?
It’s one helluva convincing book too..
Everyone will be forgotten, even extremely famous/infamous people like Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Ghengis Khan, Adolf Hitler, Michael Jackson, Lebron James
I’m not sure I get your point. If I don’t see the Bible (I’m guessing you’re talking about New Testament) as the infallible word of God, then I’m less likely to have consistent/convincing arguments? Or, I’m blinded from consistent/convincing arguments?
Humans are subjectively justifiable beings, we WILL find a way to bypass said issues sooner or later..
From an objective viewpoint what’s the consensus that substances got us to where we are today?
Okay so is the emoji for everyone you snap to or is it the indvidual person if you know what i mean ( btw sorry for asking you 3 months later)
Have you figured it out yet (btw sorry for asking you almost 8 months later)
[удалено]
No it’s actually in the Old Testament
You’ve been eating it for quite awhile I’d assume what it is isn’t as important as the fact that you’ve magically found an edible plant in the wild
It’s a Money Market Fund
So what a serial rapist is doing isnt inherently evil?
In the right context as damning and bastardly it sounds it wouldn’t be inherently evil..