Falz4567

I’m a little surprised Berdych is so low, I remember watching him beating Federer multiple times in the early 2010s. It really seemed like Berdych had his number for a while there

2 problems. 

You'd think Stan would be on this list, but it turns out he had a terrible overall record against Federer, Nadal and Djokovic year-round on the tour.

Aye Stan had a late career peak. Which he used to carve out a small number of opportunities. And managed to convert a lot of them

What has this person done wrong? Not too familiar with him. (I saw another reply saying he spoiled a game's ending but I'm guessing there's something else?)

Nothing. Usual internet drama

If he turns up to RG and he’s got enough to play 7 Matches. He’s got every chance. He’s favourite against against all but the top 3 playing their best

Nah nah sorry Guy has serious issues

People keep treating him like an infant because he looks young and cute.  I’m time to stop. Hes capable of seriously hurting himself or others He can talk all he wants. But he quiet clearly can’t walk the walk on it There’s only so long you can have sympathy 

Have you never followed Rublev? He has talked multiple times about his behaviour and how he knows its destructive. He has this

He can talk all he wants but it’s time he walked the walk on it. 

I don't understand the complete and utter refusal of people to join a guild.

Guild drama 

That’s the worst Casper I’ve seen. 

What has been going on with the calls the entire tournament? Who is going to take responsibility? Anyway congrats to Tsitsi on the resurgence. Sinner now 25-2 in 2024.

My theory is because it’s now automated most the year. They just aren’t getting their eye in at all on spotting the mark

It sadly won't cut it with a player like Sinner who is in top form

Doesn’t matter how you get there. It’s how you play when you do. 

And even when expressed as percentages, it still looks unimpressive.

As a statistician. 

Watching Musetti made me think: Do you think a flair player like Federer will ever win a Major, let alone be dominant?

Not dominant no. Players with only flair will never be

Something somethings lucky shot. 

Two things can be true: the calls were awful and Medvedev's behavior was childish and ridiculous, especially throwing the racket like that. Anyway congrats Karen.

If it was so obviously out. Stop the point. 

The commentators made the point that Meddy was actually quite far away from it too, because he was so far back on the court. So he didn't clearly see it either... but yeah, he expected Bernardes to pick it up.

Look it can’t be both. 

A great lead up to their Friday night show Smackdown where we’ll hear the response 

They don't, shut up.

So why is it being mass downvoted?

Sorry so all the people downvoting pointing out this behaviour isn’t good enough…

Ok how the HELL do you tank with prot warrior?

Try comprehending what you read

If you’re going to leave. Don’t come back to reply half hour later. 

It’ll pop a rating for a quarter and generate some buzz.  But it’s a TERRIBLE idea long term. All it’ll do is throw eyes into WWE and punks response.  Giving away mankind’s title win levels of bad idea long term

Comforting to know it’s a lot of people not just me 

His career is going to end like Kuertens I think.  One match at RG to say goodbye, barely able to move…

I see lots of nadal and federer in Alcaraz’s game but if I’m being brutally honest, I don’t see any Djokovic in his game at all. They have polar opposite play styles and techniques; Carlos is like a hurricane that comes after you with pace, power and speed. Djokovic is like a surgeon, just precise in every movement and stroke. Not really sure why people say Alcaraz is combination of the 3 of them, I would say he’s a combination of fedal mostly.

Really? What about his backhand lunges, return game, versatility on all surfaces and court coverage?

That sliding drive backhand is Novak’s legacy to the next generation. 

If I’m being honest I don’t really see that much of Roger in him.  He’s got an attacking forehand and some net skills but Roger was a fair bit more than that.  Rogers style is very much slice and dice on the backhand to set up the forehand and come in. Alcaraz is much more crash bang in his approach. 

We are definitely trading up for a receiver this year

You’ll get Josh Allen playing superman til his Achilles goes and you’ll like it

[удалено]

I think you might be proving the their point…

Almost no one.   Unless they don’t get paid by ad revenue or otherwise by the company for the game they are reviewing Or they don’t depend on special early access previews and events etc. Any that do will never badly review a game from a big or even moderate studio, less that access is pulled and their bottom line is hit  

Tony is a bit like a developer who never finishes a project. 

Grigor’s last 4 masters events - SF, F, R4, SF and a 19-4 record this year (3-1 vs top 10)

He tends to have a good period of a month or so and then fall off the map

I really don’t see Fed when I watch Dimitrov, even tonight. He’s just not nearly as aggressive. Like I see the similarities in form and movement, but the way he plays doesn’t really evoke it for me. Not sure anyone really does…Sinner maybe is the closest? But even so he still makes me think of Novak more than Roger.

I mean are you talking tactically or aesthetically?

Every player on tour is capable of hitting that shot in a vacuum. But with the Wimbledon title on the line and knowing it's Federer closing the net on you? Nadal is the only other player in the world I'd trust to make that shot in that situation.

It was never gonna be anywhere near good enough against Novak. 

It wasn't a bluff, Novak had to hit a near perfect passing shot to survive that point.

The approach was basically centre. It wasn’t close to good enough.