This bill could also affect how news are reported on Reddit. Since all news outlets report their news on social media since it has the biggest outreach compared to the traditional channels.
Nobody reads articles here and the posted headline often contradict the actual article so no losses here. Everyone wants to believe what other people made up anyway. Just more Twitter screenshots of misleading information is what makes the Reddit front page.
Exactly the same thing happened here in Australia a while ago… and Facebook made the same threat.. Google and Facebook said they may have to pull out of Australia completely… and the public reacted the exact same way, not fully considering what this really meant.
Didn’t the Aussies pass a bill like this and FB threatened to pull out of Australia too, but in the end didn’t (although I don’t remember what agreement they came to)?
Please explain how the news is “reported” on Reddit. Merely the headline is being displayed. And then there’s a Url link. Even this will not be allowed?
Why? Isn’t it just possible they are trying to get social media sites to send money to media companies - nothing more. That’s what happened in Australia.
The bill would be shooting the publishers themselves in the foot. Social media (Facebook AND Reddit) are their biggest inbound traffic sources. For big publishers, Facebook was already paying higher CPM rates also. If Facebook or Reddit were to cut off urls to publisher sites; the news publisher will see their traffic and revenues drop like a rock.
As reddit directly benefits from other companies generating news articles, I think some of the money reddit makes should be distributed to the content creators
Ironically this bill is going to fuck journalists while lining large news conglomerates pockets. It's not universal approval. They enter deals with specific companies while being able to straight ban anyone they don't want to pay for. Fact checking will be impossible when only approved news sources like Fox News are allowed. You better hope they both pay for CNN and also that CNN covered the niche topic your uncle is sharing from Fox. Remember when they called Obama a muslim? Better hope CNN runs a counter story about it.
People on Reddit supporting this bill haven't actually looked at what it says, and considered what the consequences are. This bill allows for a "joint negotiation entity" for big news companies to form under to "negotiate" and
I wonder how would it affect the traffic if all major social media sites suddenly banned sharing news... I guess it would make the renegotiate to "just use the links for free, damn it".
Ah, so it's this one again. They keep trying every couple of years. Hopefully it doesn't pass this time either, but it seems like they keep trying these stupid things and wait for people to hopefully forget before the next round.
This bill is going to speed up the acquisition of smaller news companies, isn’t it? Yeah alright anything that is an exception to anti-trust laws should be a gov service and journalism absolutely shouldn’t be a gov service
i don't think the death of traditional news media is particularly helpful for society, and a lot about that death has to do with the lack of revenue without selling ads or getting funded by special interests
Does anyone else realize this doesn’t just affect Facebook? If anyone reposts a news article here, Reddit will need to pay royalties. They are effectively killing free news and making everyone go back to the propaganda networks.
they didn't think that far ahead. facebook is apparently the only social media site in the world, and this definitely isn't a ploy by major media companies to extract money from tech companies for a hyperlink.
Corporate news lobbyists are just riding on Facebook hate to manufacture consent for this bill which will only line their pockets more while ruining the internet for everyone
Not usually on Facebook's side, but could one of you in support if this please explain why Facebook should have to pay news outlets for sharing their own articles on Facebook? Or for people who share articles on facebook...using the convenient one click "share to facebook" buttons that said news outlets put on their websites? Because that's how they get there. Facebook doesn't put anything on Facebook lol
Agreed. This makes some sense in the case of Google, because they have been pushing more and more to keep users on Google (where they sell ad space) rather than having users visit the website. Their whole business model revolves around aggregating other people's data. Though no company in their right mind wants to be removed from Googles index.
Social media provides to its users headlines and thumbnails of the articles, rather than just linking to the content. This actively discourages clickthroughs, hijacking the traffic while profiting from the content's existence without producing the content itself.
Seriously, news sites have share buttons that create attractive formatting for face book posts. If they wanted to restrict sharing, they wouldn't pay people to facilitate it. That's where the 'negotiation' should and does take place.
I wish it was a win-win. If this passes facebook isnt the only place that has to pay. We will lose so so so so many sites we hold dear. Especially in Technology.
The innate hatred of Facebook has resulted in everyone missing the actual content of this bill. Every aggregator will be in the same boat, including Reddit.
Except what that really means is that "news" with the goal of propaganda will slide in to replace news that has a business model of trying to profit from distribution of actual news. Propaganda doesn't require payment from the consumers.
Eh, you know what would replace it right? More fake news (aka places that that don't care about publisher passes because their goal is spreading propaganda) and reliance on memes for information. Sure facebook already has this problem, but it would amplify it and the already tiny liberal representation would probably die overnight.
"This bill creates a four-year safe harbor from antitrust laws for print,broadcast, or digital news companies to collectively negotiate withonline content distributors (e.g., social media companies) regarding theterms on which the news companies' content may be distributed by onlinecontent distributors. "
Exactly the same thing happened here in Australia a while ago… and Facebook made the same threat.. Google and Facebook said they may have to pull out of Australia completely… and the public reacted the exact same way, not fully considering what this really meant.
I really love how the old media has progressed from “well sell ads to cover our costs” to “well our readers will just pay us to subscribe to our paper” to “we’ll lobby Congress to force Facebook to pay us for linking to us.”
I would hope so, but I’d worry that it’d just become more of a radicalization zone for people who “don’t trust the msm” but definitely trust random accounts or YouTubers etc. saying AOC eats babies or whatever. I mean I already worry about this, but at least it’s nice to have some authoritative sources and fact checking enter the orbit, you know
"News" doesn't even have to be a full publication or an article. Many people get "news" from memes with one or two sentences. If FB did away with news from established media, it still doesn't solve for fake "news" that spread through memes or other user content.
The angle on this affecting Facebook is the least important part. It affects all new aggregators including reddit. If it posts links to news articles, or even searches them like Google, they'd have to pay or drop all links to news.
I hate Zuck as much as the next sane human, but this bill seems like garbage. The ACLU has come out against it, Ted Cruz is on board, and it basically hands publishers a free pass against antitrust action, while not guaranteeing any of the money actually goes to journalists. It forces big tech to either host everything and pay an arbitrary sum for it, or host nothing at all.
in reality it means that most likely you would not be reading a news article about this issue because Reddit wont be paying every news site to allow their links to be posted here.
More like folks ITT haven't read the article and are cheering to cut off their noses to spite facebook. This would be terrible for reddit - read the article this isn't just about facebook.
How is it so many people commenting on a technology sub don't actually understand the broader ramifications of such a bill, and how it will also directly impact Reddit?
A similar policy was passed in Australia last year, Facebook did pull their news.. for about a day or so. Other threats made to the public included the
Meta / Facebook is basically a $327 billion reverse-peep-hole that comes with a calendar that tells you how many of your family and people you knew 20 years ago had a birthday yesterday.
The only people that are supporting this and saying to do it don't realize what the bill actually says. Please stop basing opinions off a headline. It literally describes it as a "safe harbor from anti trust laws" for large corpos.
Please do. People use FB for news, so it should slow misinformation also. If nobody ever used it again the world would be a better place. Entrepreneurs can find a way to create thriving “communities” online without Russian bots, and evil CEO’s, IMHO.
Here's the actual news here. The fact that Zuckerberg knows that enough people in enough high places rely on Facebook (much like Google) to help place stories in front of the "right" eyes that he could threaten to do this and it would be enough to stop the legislation from passing.
This wouldn’t be bad for Facebook, people would simply look at other stuff on Facebook. But it would destroy all the clickbait trash sites like Fox that rely on this traffic.
I think the exception should be things like Google's amp, which literally robs most news sites of getting a LOT of clicks by archiving their content and relaying it to you themselves in the name of "faster loading times"
If meta, reddit, or other link sharing websites are earning money from the news posted on their pages, the newspapers deserve to be be paid too. Why is this "ill-considered"? It's common sense and necessary for free press to survive.
All this bill does is make it so no website can share news links without having to pay for them and since the vast majority of websites already have razor thin profits, none of them will do that.
Who in the world is getting their news from Facebook? When someone tells me about something they saw on FB I literally refuse to believe it until I see a corroborating source.
Good. That might throw a curveball to the sheep that take everything they see on their TV's and Social Media as factual. The News used to report Facts and we would have to form an opinion of what was broadcasted. Now, Media outlets push the opinions of whomever is paying them and its our job to determine whether or not it is indeed factual. Also, the Governments job is NOT to tell us how to think, act or tell us what we should be doing to stay happy and healthy. The Governments job is to ensure that our Constitutional Rights as Americans aren't being trampled. They all suck at their jobs and have sold the People out to the highest bidder.
I feel like any bill that's not supported by Bernie means its likely to be suspect. Manchin supports this bill so you know its a bad deal for anyone but the powerful.
This bill could also affect how news are reported on Reddit. Since all news outlets report their news on social media since it has the biggest outreach compared to the traditional channels.
Yeah I’m sure the bill isn’t pristine but I can’t see FB pulling news from their platform as a bad thing.
Nobody reads articles here and the posted headline often contradict the actual article so no losses here. Everyone wants to believe what other people made up anyway. Just more Twitter screenshots of misleading information is what makes the Reddit front page.
Exactly the same thing happened here in Australia a while ago… and Facebook made the same threat.. Google and Facebook said they may have to pull out of Australia completely… and the public reacted the exact same way, not fully considering what this really meant.
Didn’t the Aussies pass a bill like this and FB threatened to pull out of Australia too, but in the end didn’t (although I don’t remember what agreement they came to)?
Please explain how the news is “reported” on Reddit. Merely the headline is being displayed. And then there’s a Url link. Even this will not be allowed?
Why? Isn’t it just possible they are trying to get social media sites to send money to media companies - nothing more. That’s what happened in Australia.
The bill would be shooting the publishers themselves in the foot. Social media (Facebook AND Reddit) are their biggest inbound traffic sources. For big publishers, Facebook was already paying higher CPM rates also. If Facebook or Reddit were to cut off urls to publisher sites; the news publisher will see their traffic and revenues drop like a rock.
As reddit directly benefits from other companies generating news articles, I think some of the money reddit makes should be distributed to the content creators
Ironically this bill is going to fuck journalists while lining large news conglomerates pockets. It's not universal approval. They enter deals with specific companies while being able to straight ban anyone they don't want to pay for. Fact checking will be impossible when only approved news sources like Fox News are allowed. You better hope they both pay for CNN and also that CNN covered the niche topic your uncle is sharing from Fox. Remember when they called Obama a muslim? Better hope CNN runs a counter story about it.
Oh please find a better example than CNN…
People on Reddit supporting this bill haven't actually looked at what it says, and considered what the consequences are. This bill allows for a "joint negotiation entity" for big news companies to form under to "negotiate" and
I wonder how would it affect the traffic if all major social media sites suddenly banned sharing news... I guess it would make the renegotiate to "just use the links for free, damn it".
This is just Rupert Murdoch trying to get the government to let him take money from tech companies.
Ah, so it's this one again. They keep trying every couple of years. Hopefully it doesn't pass this time either, but it seems like they keep trying these stupid things and wait for people to hopefully forget before the next round.
It would be a pretty dumb move on their part.
So this is a sort of price fixing cartel or union for big media companies, expressly permitted by legislation. Yuck.
This bill is going to speed up the acquisition of smaller news companies, isn’t it? Yeah alright anything that is an exception to anti-trust laws should be a gov service and journalism absolutely shouldn’t be a gov service
i don't think the death of traditional news media is particularly helpful for society, and a lot about that death has to do with the lack of revenue without selling ads or getting funded by special interests
Yea, I'm not sure people realize that this post itself wouldn't exist if Reddit ended up doing the same thing...
Does anyone else realize this doesn’t just affect Facebook? If anyone reposts a news article here, Reddit will need to pay royalties. They are effectively killing free news and making everyone go back to the propaganda networks.
they didn't think that far ahead. facebook is apparently the only social media site in the world, and this definitely isn't a ploy by major media companies to extract money from tech companies for a hyperlink.
Corporate news lobbyists are just riding on Facebook hate to manufacture consent for this bill which will only line their pockets more while ruining the internet for everyone
Damn, that would be a real shame if there was propaganda on reddit
Not usually on Facebook's side, but could one of you in support if this please explain why Facebook should have to pay news outlets for sharing their own articles on Facebook? Or for people who share articles on facebook...using the convenient one click "share to facebook" buttons that said news outlets put on their websites? Because that's how they get there. Facebook doesn't put anything on Facebook lol
The main issue is that Facebook and Google summarize stories preventing traffic. But yeah just linking shouldn't be charged. It makes no sense.
Agreed. This makes some sense in the case of Google, because they have been pushing more and more to keep users on Google (where they sell ad space) rather than having users visit the website. Their whole business model revolves around aggregating other people's data. Though no company in their right mind wants to be removed from Googles index.
Social media provides to its users headlines and thumbnails of the articles, rather than just linking to the content. This actively discourages clickthroughs, hijacking the traffic while profiting from the content's existence without producing the content itself.
Seriously, news sites have share buttons that create attractive formatting for face book posts. If they wanted to restrict sharing, they wouldn't pay people to facilitate it. That's where the 'negotiation' should and does take place.
This seems like a win/win, no?
[удалено]
There's no win, it will affect sites like reddit too. Do you really want to have to pay to post a link and a brief snippet of a news article?
I wish it was a win-win. If this passes facebook isnt the only place that has to pay. We will lose so so so so many sites we hold dear. Especially in Technology.
yeah no kidding. who gets their news from facebook anyway?
The innate hatred of Facebook has resulted in everyone missing the actual content of this bill. Every aggregator will be in the same boat, including Reddit.
Except what that really means is that "news" with the goal of propaganda will slide in to replace news that has a business model of trying to profit from distribution of actual news. Propaganda doesn't require payment from the consumers.
Ok, before we wank ourselves off too much, this is the same bill Murdoch tried to pass in AU to mug fb/google for control.
Bye bye Reddit. Or can't you think that far ahead?
You're replying to a post that likely wouldn't exist if this law passed. Just for context.
Eh, you know what would replace it right? More fake news (aka places that that don't care about publisher passes because their goal is spreading propaganda) and reliance on memes for information. Sure facebook already has this problem, but it would amplify it and the already tiny liberal representation would probably die overnight.
Yes a win/win
They tried the same trick when Australia was passing the same laws. Our response: Go ahead and pull all services from Australia.
Oh no
Someone needs to pay businessinsider for this Reddit post now.
It wouldn’t be at all.
"This bill creates a four-year safe harbor from antitrust laws for print,broadcast, or digital news companies to collectively negotiate withonline content distributors (e.g., social media companies) regarding theterms on which the news companies' content may be distributed by onlinecontent distributors. "
Exactly the same thing happened here in Australia a while ago… and Facebook made the same threat.. Google and Facebook said they may have to pull out of Australia completely… and the public reacted the exact same way, not fully considering what this really meant.
It was Fairfax, News Corp, and the ABC pushing for it.
This is what the bill is trying to force yet people here are cheering for it. Do people think Reddit doesn't link to news?
I really love how the old media has progressed from “well sell ads to cover our costs” to “well our readers will just pay us to subscribe to our paper” to “we’ll lobby Congress to force Facebook to pay us for linking to us.”
It's like when some image hosting services started to block hotlinking.
Wouldn't the population be better off knowing they can't get real news from Facebook and would actually open better sources on thier own?
I would hope so, but I’d worry that it’d just become more of a radicalization zone for people who “don’t trust the msm” but definitely trust random accounts or YouTubers etc. saying AOC eats babies or whatever. I mean I already worry about this, but at least it’s nice to have some authoritative sources and fact checking enter the orbit, you know
Of course. I hope Zuk pulls the trigger on this.
”They said they removed news from Facebook but all my news sources are still around.” - Average Facebook news aficionado, confidently
Does that apply to Reddit as well? Because the bill sure does.
"News" doesn't even have to be a full publication or an article. Many people get "news" from memes with one or two sentences. If FB did away with news from established media, it still doesn't solve for fake "news" that spread through memes or other user content.
Which legacy news media billionaire is paying you?
“I can’t get news from Facebook anymore? Well, off to project Camelot! They never let me down!”
You think most Americans will actually do that?
I, for one, am looking forward to manual RSS feeds and the Fediverse to take over as the outrage machine crumbles under it's own bloat.
A majority of people getting their news from Facebook now aren't getting accurate or real information to begin with.
People wont care. They will believe what they want to.
Unfortunately, there’s a significant portion of our population that has long ago given up on real news sources.
The angle on this affecting Facebook is the least important part. It affects all new aggregators including reddit. If it posts links to news articles, or even searches them like Google, they'd have to pay or drop all links to news.
Don’t tempt me with a good time
I hate Zuck as much as the next sane human, but this bill seems like garbage. The ACLU has come out against it, Ted Cruz is on board, and it basically hands publishers a free pass against antitrust action, while not guaranteeing any of the money actually goes to journalists. It forces big tech to either host everything and pay an arbitrary sum for it, or host nothing at all.
Yeah sort of like "if you don't stop that right now I'ma buy you ice cream!!!"
It's not just Facebook who will have to deal with this. Apple, Google, and even Reddit, will all fall under this.
in reality it means that most likely you would not be reading a news article about this issue because Reddit wont be paying every news site to allow their links to be posted here.
The bill would actually be quite dangerous for consumers and Businesses. (Edited)
Will this law change the way reddit operates?
Yes, people ITT didn't read past the title, as per usual.
Yep! This law applies to sites that provide hyperlinks to news sites. Like Reddit.
So you're saying they are willing to cut off their news to spite their Facebook.
More like folks ITT haven't read the article and are cheering to cut off their noses to spite facebook. This would be terrible for reddit - read the article this isn't just about facebook.
Facebookplanting.
Very good sir!
An excellent joke. Thank you for this.
Wow. Amazing.
Lol at the fools supporting this crap because Fuck Zuck.
That is why the article mentions meta on the title, for the clicks. The correct title should be "new law could possibly affect most of the internet"
How is it so many people commenting on a technology sub don't actually understand the broader ramifications of such a bill, and how it will also directly impact Reddit?
A similar policy was passed in Australia last year, Facebook did pull their news.. for about a day or so. Other threats made to the public included the
Oh no… not that… anything but that.
Meta / Facebook is basically a $327 billion reverse-peep-hole that comes with a calendar that tells you how many of your family and people you knew 20 years ago had a birthday yesterday.
The only people that are supporting this and saying to do it don't realize what the bill actually says. Please stop basing opinions off a headline. It literally describes it as a "safe harbor from anti trust laws" for large corpos.
Wouldn't this mean that random links would be there with conspiracies but not actual news sites?
I removed the news tab from the Facebook app while ago. Who the hell get their news from FB with all the misinformation going in their platform.
How DARE we expect these massive companies to pay their fair share!
Omg, please pass this bill. As a matter of fact, apply it to ads as well.
"Do what we want, or we will do this thing that permanently reduces the worth of our own service. That will show you!"
Yeah, government mandating price extortion for Rupert Murdoch's Media empire is a good thing!
Wouldn't be great to leave only the rubbish on Facebook and no need to filter anymore...
“We couldn’t blackmail Australia so we’re going to try the us”
Good. Meta decides what you see from the news anyway, so getting rid of it is good.
Without even reading the article, my input is this:
Oh no, say it ain’t so
Do it! Remove all news from social media! It will be good for the mental health of the nation!
Pay for your content meta
I dunno about this bill, but I don't think this is the epic gotcha that Facebook thinks it is lol
Don’t threaten me with a good time
Not sure how to feel about this. On one end, lot of people get their news from social media. On the other, fuck getting news from social media.
So Meta is threatening to cut its own throat if it doesn’t get its way? Lemme grab popcorn
"I see this as an absolute win!"
Honestly, if Facebook would stop pushing random bullshit and just show you your friends again people might actually use it.
So the bill will work exactly as intended. Got it.
Do it! I fucking triple dog dare them.
Good maybe these FB idiots will get news from actual news outlets, not that it’s any better
Please do. People use FB for news, so it should slow misinformation also. If nobody ever used it again the world would be a better place. Entrepreneurs can find a way to create thriving “communities” online without Russian bots, and evil CEO’s, IMHO.
I think one of the best things we can pass to the next generation is a world with a lot less social media and garbage people playing CeOs of them
The very fact that you oppose this makes me think we are on to something..
Interesting how Meta and some other corps persistently threaten us with a good time.
Don't get your news from Reddit and facebook.
This just gets better and better all the time.
How would this not be a good thing? Facebook probably spreads more misinformation than any other platform
When your entire business model revolves around taking things from everybody without paying them.
If this means that I’ll never have to see a link from a paywalled low quality site like Business Insider again, I’m all for it.
Facebook was great when when it was when my family and friends updated each other on kids and puppies and vacations.
Here's the actual news here. The fact that Zuckerberg knows that enough people in enough high places rely on Facebook (much like Google) to help place stories in front of the "right" eyes that he could threaten to do this and it would be enough to stop the legislation from passing.
Don't threaten us with a good time.
They are threatening something that would make the world a better place
Sounds like a good plan to me.
Stop. Don’t. Come back.
Why is the bill ill conceived? Sounds like a way to hold Meta accountable for the bullshit they call news that gets spread on their fucking platform.
dont threaten me with a good time
Great, this sounds awesome! People shouldnt get their news from Facebook anyway.
Good. Facebook shouldn’t be in the news business anyway.
Do it. We all would be better off. Better yet pull the plug on Facebook Instagram and WhatsApp for ever
GOOD WE DONT WANT YOUR NEWS ON THE FACEBOOK FEED!
Not much of a threat.
So, charge for linking things on the internet? Yeah no.
Oh please, pull all the “news” from Facebook.
Omg yes please stop the lies and the cringe
Meta is threatening to hurt itself? Oh no…
You think reddit will fair any better? Same bill that makes Facebook want to ban news will also force reddit mods to auto ban news.
Why do you think this move would be bad for Meta at all? They already don't make any money for linking to these sites.
This wouldn’t be bad for Facebook, people would simply look at other stuff on Facebook. But it would destroy all the clickbait trash sites like Fox that rely on this traffic.
Facebook:
I think the exception should be things like Google's amp, which literally robs most news sites of getting a LOT of clicks by archiving their content and relaying it to you themselves in the name of "faster loading times"
If meta, reddit, or other link sharing websites are earning money from the news posted on their pages, the newspapers deserve to be be paid too. Why is this "ill-considered"? It's common sense and necessary for free press to survive.
If you haven’t deleted Facebook already, what are you waiting for? Do you still have a MySpace page too?
... If we can't manipulate the news...there will be no news. Zucks a POS.
Fake news being removed from a major platform is a win in my book.
Just shut it down
Facebook doesn’t have news it has bullshit and lies 85% of the time
liberal facebook should not have been reporting the news to start with.
I don’t think anyone wanted news on Facebook to begin with.
So what's the catch?
All this bill does is make it so no website can share news links without having to pay for them and since the vast majority of websites already have razor thin profits, none of them will do that.
[удалено]
It's like the time he said he will pull the plug on Facebook EU if the union makes a certain law. Like we depend on Facebook ...
Am I the only one that finds this reasonable? Like they run the numbers and know what is worth paying for.
It would probably make Facebook fun again. I support this!
Who in the world is getting their news from Facebook? When someone tells me about something they saw on FB I literally refuse to believe it until I see a corroborating source.
If you aren’t paying for it, you’re the product.
I can’t stand these whiney billionaires
Fuck meta.
Don't threaten me with a good time.
Fucking do it
Please don't threaten me with a good time!
Can't they just pull all ads instead
If that helps the world have less antivaxxers im all for it.
Oh no! Anyways
Oh my god, they'll have to share their profits..
When they are furious like that, then it is good news.
Absolute win gif
Do it. Pound in the final nail
Every time I see this picture, I just can’t get over that Zuckerberg sociopathic serial killer look.
Sounds like a good thing
Promise?
Facebook is a horrible outlet for news anyway.. they should do it!
The one time it’s actually okay to agree with Zuck
Can they do it globally?
Please pull all 'news' from facebook.
Wait, Meta is Facebook?!
Do it. Please we beg you
Goddamnit stop threatening me with a good time!
Well that would be so refreshing. Pull the news. Nobody wants it anyways.
I am imagining willy Wonka saying "stop, don't" in a completely dismissive tone.
Good. That might throw a curveball to the sheep that take everything they see on their TV's and Social Media as factual. The News used to report Facts and we would have to form an opinion of what was broadcasted. Now, Media outlets push the opinions of whomever is paying them and its our job to determine whether or not it is indeed factual. Also, the Governments job is NOT to tell us how to think, act or tell us what we should be doing to stay happy and healthy. The Governments job is to ensure that our Constitutional Rights as Americans aren't being trampled. They all suck at their jobs and have sold the People out to the highest bidder.
I feel like any bill that's not supported by Bernie means its likely to be suspect. Manchin supports this bill so you know its a bad deal for anyone but the powerful.
Hell yeah! It’ll be just like classic Facebook
Oh no please stop don’t do that no no no the horror why God why
Can someone get this poor fella in touch with a better hair dresser?
Oh no. Anyways
Fb constantly threatens shit and it’s all shit that would make the world better on the whole
Forcing facebook users to actually go to news outlets sounds like progress.