I think the NYT can be a mixed bag. Some of the stuff they put out is great top tear journalism, and some of it it really quite opinionated and bad. I don't they, as the telegraph is suggesting, they have some particular animus towards the United Kingdom, but I do think some of their writers really like bashing wealthy western countries because they spend too much time on twitter and think it makes them edgy and cool.
Rule VIII: Submission Quality
Did you... uh... want to give any details behind that or anything?
NO 👁👄👁
Might be in reference to this
I think the NYT can be a mixed bag. Some of the stuff they put out is great top tear journalism, and some of it it really quite opinionated and bad. I don't they, as the telegraph is suggesting, they have some particular animus towards the United Kingdom, but I do think some of their writers really like bashing wealthy western countries because they spend too much time on twitter and think it makes them edgy and cool.
*tier
Lets not forget their boner for the iraq war
We’re actually talking about changing the name to the New Amsterdam Times
Lmao
The NYT barely understands their own country outside of NYC, so I’m not surprised. Their coverage of Britain and France is unhinged.
A few years ago for April Fools Day the LA Times wrote about NYC the way the NYT writes about anywhere that’s not NYC and it was pretty
I totally believe you but can you provide any example articles, I'd like to know what their views are.
New Yor Y Y
No idea about the NYT.
Actually the NYT appears to view it as it’s mission to annoy its readers with an endless stream of “I used to be a Democrat until…” articles.
The Torygraph complaining about another media bias is worrying... Who am I kidding, who cares.
They hate Brits so much that they hired them to write??
Who have they hired and what hatred are they referring too?
Too bad it says Britain. Would have cared otherwise.