William H. Replogle, Ph.D. and F. J. Eicke, Ed.D.
There is ample evidence that alcoholics experience high levels
of anxiety.1,2,3 The effects of alcohol on reducing anxiety and
fear at both the physiological level, on the nervous system as
a whole and in particular on the sympathetic nervous system,4
and the psychological level are also well established.5 Although
a myriad of fundamental questions remain concerning the etiology
of alcoholism, there is sufficient evidence that individuals who
experience excessive anxiety are prone to alleviate this condition
by consuming alcohol.6 Dollard and Miller have proposed that alcohol
dependent symptoms are learned behaviours in accordance with reinforcement
principles.7 Because the effects of alcohol intake are so immediate,
the intake is considered particularly reinforcing. The medical
profession has, in general, treated anxiety among alcoholics with
benzodiazepines which affect the central nervous system in much
the same way as alcohol; albeit practitioners in the field of
alcohol dependency and the AMA 8 have discouraged such practices
due to the potential abuse of or dependence on the benzodiazepines.
Megadoses of vitamins have proven beneficial as an adjunct therapy
in the reduction of anxiety and in the treatment of alcoholism
with no potential for abuse or dependence. Improvement with megavitamins,
however, has been reported to occur between the third and sixth
month of treatment.9 The purpose of the present study was to examine
the short-term effects of a megavitamin regimen as an adjunct
therapy in the reduction of anxiety in an alcoholic population.
Also of interest was the short-term effects of a megavitamin regimen
in the reduction of depression.
Method
Subjects. Participants in the present investigation were male
residents of a 30 day residential treatment program in rural Alabama
for individuals whose consumption of alcohol had disrupted their
social and/or economic functioning, Subjects consisted of forty-four
(44) consecutive voluntary admissions of male patients to the
residential program. One subject was excluded from the study because
of diabetes. Three subjects from the experimental group and two
subjects from the placebo group left the program prior to completion
against professional advice. This resulted in 19 subjects in both
the experimental and placebo groups with a mean age of 42.4 years
(S.D.=11.8).
Procedure: Subjects were assigned to either the experimental or placebo group
using an ABBA counterbalanced design. Beginning at 1:00 p.m. on
the fourth day after admission, but not before the subject had
been at least seven (7) days without intake of alcohol, each subject
was administered Form R of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality
Inventory (MMPI),10 the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form-Y (STAI)11
and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). 12 Beginning the
day after testing, subjects assigned to the experimental condition
were administered three capsules P.C. Each capsule contained 333
mg vitamin C, 333 mg niacin, 66 mg vitamin B6 and 66 IUs vitamin
E. Each subject, therefore, received a total of 2.997 g of vitamin
C and niacin, 594 mg vitamin B, and 594 IU vitamin E per day.
Subjects in the placebo condition were administered one Double
0 gelatin capsule P.C. which contained the equivalent to the inert
carrier of the megavitamin capsules. Subjects remained on their
respective regimen for 21 consecutive days. All subjects otherwise
participated in the .same residential treatment program consisting
of two group therapy sessions each week day and five nightly A.A.
meetings per week. Subjects were not allowed to take anti-anxiety
or antidepression agents while participating in the residential
program. At 1:00 p.m. on the day following the 21st day of medication
administration each subject was again administered the MMPI, STAI
and SDS.
Results
A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA)
was utilized in the present study with the Depression (MMPI-D)
and Psychasthenia (MMPI-Pt) scales of the MMPI, the State (STAI-S)
and the Trait (STAI-T) Anxiety scales of the STAI and the SDS
serving as dependent measures.
The MANOVA resulted in a between subjects factor main effect of
F(l,36)=.l6, p > .05, a within subjects main effect of F(1,36)
= 17.97, p < .001 and between subjects X within-subjects interaction
of F(1,36) = 1O.1g, p < .003. Having established the overall multivariate
significance of this model, each dependent measure was submitted
to a univariate repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)
to determine its individual contribution to the multivariate significance.
The ANOVA for the MMPI-D resulted in a between-subjects main effect
F(l,36)= .02, p >.05, a within-subjects main effect F(1,36) =
3.69. p < .05 and a between subjects X within-subjects interaction
of F(1,36) = 2.23, p > .05.
The ANOVA for the MMPI-P t resulted in a between-subjects main
effect F(l,36)= .43, p > .05, a within-subjects main effect F(1,36)
= 2.16, p > .05 and a between-subjects X within-subjects interaction
F(1,36) = 4.29, p < .05.
The ANOVA for the STAI-S resulted in a between-subjects main effect
F(l,36) = .03, p > .05, a within-subjects main effect F(1,36)
= 8.12, p < .008 and a between-subjects X within-subjects interaction
of F(1,36) = 7.81, p < .009, which qualified the previous main
effect.
The ANOVA for the STAI-T resulted in a between-subjects main effect
of F(l,36)= 2.37, p >.05, a within-subjects main effect of F(l,36)
= l.85, p > .05 and a between-subjects X within-subjects interaction
of F(1,36) = 4.11, p < .05.
The ANOVA for the SDS resulted in a between-subjects main effect
of F(1,36) = .52, p > .05, a within-subjects main effect of F(1,36)
= 22.76, p < .0001 and a between-subjects X within-subjects interaction
of F(l,36) = .97, p > .05.
As can be noted, the three anxiety measures (MMPI-P t, STAI-S,
and STAI-T) each resulted in significant interactions. Interaction
effects for the two depression variables failed to reach conventional
levels of significance.
Discussion
The purpose of the present study was to examine the short term
effects of a megavitamin regimen as an adjunct therapy in aresidential
treatment program for alcohol abuse in the reduction of anxiety
and depression. Both depression measures produced significant
within-subject main effects indicating that reductions in depression
were found regardless of treatment condition. Results of the present
study suggest that a treatment period of twenty-one days produced
a significant decrease in depression but could not be attributed
to the megavitamin therapy as adjunct to the residential treatment
program.
The three anxiety measures produced significant interaction effects,
with the megavitamin group showing decreased anxiety as compared
to the placebo group. It is also important to note that the megavitamin
regimen was used as an adjunct to group therapy and exposure to
A.A. and not as an adjunct to Orthomolecular Therapy. There was
no attempt, for instance, to regulate the quality or quantity
of food consumption during treatment. Subjects were allowed to
consume candy, soft drinks, coffee, cigarettes, etc., at their
will. Regardless, there is a definite trend among the anxiety
measures after a 21 day period which is consistent with the therapeutic
effects of megavitamins reported to occur between the third and
sixth month of treatment.9 Results of this study indicate that
the present megavitamin therapy regimen may produce clinical improvement
in anxiety in as little as three weeks. This short term treatment
period is comparable
the treatment period required to obtain clinical improvement
for the benzodiazeines which has been reported to occur between
the second and third week by Hollister13 and between the fourth
and sixth week by Rickels.14
References