zyzzbrah21



Legally Reported Available Shares visualized

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.

Gives 100 Reddit Coins and a week of r/lounge access and ad-free browsing.

When you follow your heart, love is the answer

A golden splash of respect

A glittering stamp for a feel-good thing

I'm catching the vibration



Counter-DD: The Real (Legal) Count of Available Shares... and why computershared.net doesn't show short-interest

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.

Gives 100 Reddit Coins and a week of r/lounge access and ad-free browsing.

Thank you stranger. Shows the award.

When you come across a feel-good thing.

A glowing commendation for all to see

I'm in this with you.

An amazing showing.

Listen, get educated, and get involved.

A golden splash of respect

A glittering stamp for a feel-good thing

Can't stop seeing stars

A smol, delicate danger noodle.

OBJECTION!

I can't help but look.

Shows the Computersharing Is Caring Award and grants %{coin_symbol}100 Coins to the community. Exclusive to this community.










🏴‍☠️GME's Float is technically already locked 🏴‍☠️ See it:

Add my power to yours.

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.

A glowing commendation for all to see

I'm in this with you.

Listen, get educated, and get involved.

Can't stop seeing stars

Boldly go where we haven't been in a long, long time.

Did somebody say 'Murica?

Thank you stranger. Shows the award.

When you come across a feel-good thing.

An amazing showing.

When you follow your heart, love is the answer

Let's sip to good health and good company



So, Ryan Cohen happens to tweet right when Uranus is lined up before the Moon for the perfect trajectory! Strap in your seat space apes!! We are go for mission MOASS!!!

Thank you stranger. Shows the award.

When you come across a feel-good thing.

A glowing commendation for all to see

Can't stop seeing stars

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.

I'm in this with you.

A golden splash of respect

A smol, delicate danger noodle.

Boldly go where we haven't been in a long, long time.




Well?

A glowing commendation for all to see

A golden splash of respect

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.

Thank you stranger. Shows the award.

When you come across a feel-good thing.



Bottom is in. This IS the CRITICAL MARGIN THEORY via Collateral for shorts. This is NOT your DORITO of DOOM. This is SPY (as collateral) vs the price of GME. Below the Purple line, hedgies R fukt. Above the green line, hedgies 'bout to get fooked, possibly 150% fookt in a few short days.

When you come across a feel-good thing.

Gives 700 Reddit Coins and a month of r/lounge access and ad-free browsing.

Boldly go where we haven't been in a long, long time.

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.

Thank you stranger. Shows the award.

A glowing commendation for all to see

I'm in this with you.

Listen, get educated, and get involved.

A golden splash of respect

A glittering stamp for a feel-good thing

For an especially amazing showing.

Gives 100 Reddit Coins and a week of r/lounge access and ad-free browsing.

Let's sip to good health and good company

My kindergarten teacher, my cat, my mom, and you.

I'm catching the vibration

Can't stop seeing stars


To all the Shills out there saying GME can't happen again. You're welcome

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.

Thank you stranger. Shows the award.

When you come across a feel-good thing.

A glowing commendation for all to see

This goes a long way to restore my faith in the people of Earth

An amazing showing.

[Happy crab noises]

Did somebody say 'Murica?

Shows the Saturn Award and grants %{coin_symbol}200 Coins to the community. Exclusive to this community.




This plan has been in the works for years. Countdown has begun and nobody noticed.

When you come across a feel-good thing.

I'm in this with you.

An amazing showing.

A golden splash of respect

A glittering stamp for a feel-good thing

Thank you stranger. Shows the award.

A glowing commendation for all to see

Listen, get educated, and get involved.

Boldly go where we haven't been in a long, long time.

Shows the Silver Award... and that's it.


  1. This was what I based a lot of my thesis on. When we broke this ratio to the downside, it means MOASS has begun. then pulling this ratio this far “up” (weakening vs SPY) tells me they are on their final legs before they have to launch the rocket.

  2. A few key things: 100% short utilization for almost a year, Volatility halts every time GME reaches critical margin followed by extreme shorting, 8.5:1 average buy to sell ratio along with constant 70%+ short volume… not to mention that numerous times where GME has neared a point of critical, Citadel has either raised cash or withdrawn from other funds (surprised more people aren’t talking about this)… oh and DRS of course.

  3. You can’t cover using institutional shares that you had already borrowed to short. in order for you to cover your short using institutional shares, an institution that is currently not lending its shares out would need to sell. An institution could not sell if it’s shares were lent out, said institution would need to recall its shares (causing buying pressure) in order to sell to allow hedge funds to cover said short.

  4. Unless I'm reading your original post incorrectly I get the following numbers:

  5. U read my post wrong. If you look in the comments to the mod I go over it

  6. His math works in either event. If they are loaning shares that are being used to short, then they would need to recall their shares thus forcing shorts to buy back if they wanted to sell.

  7. Hi - the point of my post was not to say they have to “close” or can’t short anymore. It marks a point where on paper, the math stops checking out. When we effectively get to the point where there are less shares left in “existence” based on a simple equation, you as an investor can actually prove and say that something is wrong here. The reason this by definition was never possible before DRS was because all shares previously were owned at the broker which means they were always in the brokers name and never the investor so short sellers could never “theoretically” be in a position that they couldn’t “close” because you could point to all the shares at the broker and claim they are available to use the cover. now DRS brought a variable/metric that could be used as a check on that equation. Because of that we can calculate the difference in the equation and when they no longer balance, it shows us that there is not enough available liquidity for shorts to “close” as DRS shares cannot be touched as they are held at the transfer against and not in broker name. I don’t know what will happen when we reach the point I mentioned in my post, I just know we can look at the equation and without a doubt, be able to prove something is not right.

  8. Hi - the point of my post was not to say they have to “close” or can’t short anymore. It marks a point where on paper, the math stops checking out. When we effectively get to the point where there are less shares left in “existence” based on a simple equation, you as an investor can actually prove and say that something is wrong here. The reason this by definition was never possible before DRS was because all shares previously were owned at the broker which means they were always in the brokers name and never the investor so short sellers could never “theoretically” be in a position that they couldn’t “close” because you could point to all the shares at the broker and claim they are available to use the cover. now DRS brought a variable/metric that could be used as a check on that equation. Because of that we can calculate the difference in the equation and when they no longer balance, it shows us that there is not enough available liquidity for shorts to “close” as DRS shares cannot be touched as they are held at the transfer against and not in broker name. I don’t know what will happen when we reach the point I mentioned in my post, I just know we can look at the equation and without a doubt, be able to prove something is not right.

  9. yes in 2020… the fomo came because REPORTED numbers didn’t make sense. The fomo will return once again when the numbers don’t make sense. You cant prove shit until the numbers actually show (even though we know it’s fake) that DRSd shares have proven that reported shorts can’t cover. When we can do that (in 10 million shares) the fomo will return because we have proven what the MSM and large institutions have been lying to the general public about for the last year and a half.

  10. We will never be allowed to DRS more shares than “legally” exist because doing so will destroy the system. it’s a 10 million share count down to when “reported shorts” can no longer cover and until institutional numbers or reported shorts change, that’s what the world needs to know. Institutions can lend all they want and shorts can do their thing, but when we DRS more shares than should theoretically be available for us to do so, we are going to see some serious movement.

  11. I take exception to you calling my post out as misinformation without a shred of corroborating evidence. The free float = 266 million shares

  12. This definition was created assuming infinite liquidity at the brokers. DRS is by structural means “stagnant/restricted” shares. You are relying a finance classroom definition, something that was destroyed by DRS and is no longer true or accurate. To follow and tell others to follow a definition that is not correct, that none of on Wall Street view as accurate discredits the drs movement. By your definition, we could never lock the “free float” because all shares can be sold, because you are under the assumption that if a share is owned, then it must be for sale. While I assume that if it is owned, it is not for sale and I must account for that when trying to market make.

  13. It's expressed as percentage of free float registered. There are 266 million shares floating. Retail has locked ~89 million. The remainder are freely floating. You can't reduce the free float because you don't think it's for sale

  14. You just ignored everything I said. I’m going to end this here. You can bring a horse to water, you can’t make it drink.

  15. I think this “full float” talk needs to get thrown out the window. I’m in the industry in s&t and have brought this question up to multiple middle office guys (settlements, ops, tcu, etc) this is their wheelhouse completely. The general answer basically revolves around the idea that the transfer agent would never allow this. They have a full registry of shares bought by institutions, etfs, insiders, and DRS. When we get to the point when the shares on that registry minus reported shorts (yes they have that count too) gets to zero. They will have to sound the alarm. This will be an operational nightmare for everyone and allowing us to buy all shares outstanding will be impossible. The free float is what we should be focused on and nothing else… they will never let us get that far, but still. As of now the number of “free shares” remaining when taking into account reported short interest is 8-10 million shares…. Yes 8-10 million.

  16. This is a very trust me bro comment. You should totally make a post about this because a) I trust you, bro, and b) it's the first time I've ever heard anyone say a transfer agent has visibility inside Cede & Co and / or the number of shorts.

  17. That’s the thing. As the transfer agent, it’s by legal definition your job to keep proper and accurate logs of the share count. Reported short interest are shares on loan that have been reported and shorted into the market. So there must legally be enough shares available to cover and “close” those shorts in the market. If they allow us to buy through the reported SI all the way to the free float and more, Computershare would legally be responsible for not adhering to their job as a transfer agent. I’ll see if I can get something in writing from one of my ops team without doxing anyone or doing anything again company policy.

  18. I thought we were almost 60% locked. How are we cut almost in half ?

  19. We are at 60% of the free float. Technically we only have about 8-10 million more to DRS before all existing shares should be accounted for. OP is just regarded

  20. I'm using the correct definition of free float. If I'm wrong, please link me to the definition that says institutions, ETFs, mutual funds and 'stagnant' shares aren't floating and shouldn't be counted in the denominator

  21. see that is where u are wrong. Institutions, ETF’s, MFs etc all have “reported” ownership. This means that the transfer agent knows how many they own on the ledger. The transfer agent also has visibility into reported shorts on loan. When take all shares outstanding, subtract all institutions and insiders, then subtract reported SI and DRS… you are then left with the amount of shares that the transfer agent recognizes as “free” shares on the open market. Right now that number is at approx 8-10 million. When we DRS those remaining “floating” shares, the loudest alarm signaling borderline Armageddon will sound, because no other shares can be bought or should legally trade. (Unless institutions selloff). Your statement above is misinformation.

  22. No u moron, it takes 5 days to process and settle. You get the price you sell for immediately.

  23. Math checks out. Can’t believe here I was calculating when reported shorts couldn’t cover. I completely forgot about call holders. Well done op

  24. yep, just the retardation I needed, thank you. This is the timeline I belong in

  25. Nice try ken, I’ll just buy hodl and DRS even harder

  26. I’m sure this will get lost, but this guy is onto an algo cycle to the likes we haven’t seen before. I think he’s right

  27. Nice try mayoman. I just set my limit buy for 10 more GME in Computershare tm

  28. According to you “the end game (for real this time)” was 12 months ago. So did it end?

  29. I’ve said it before, they can only let us DRS until we reach the level at which reported shorts are no longer able to cover. Right now that’s 20-25% of the float; or 50 million shares. This in theory means that “reported shorts” will be scrambling for the exit in about 15-20 million more DRSd shares. When they run out of air, it will be the nail on the coffin for both reported shorts and the market makers who have been hiding the rest of the iceberg on the back of swaps, TRS, and derivatives hedging. When we get to 75-80% of the free float, then naked short selling will have been proven once and for all. There will be no way out for them. We aren’t locked in here with them…They are locked in here with us.

  30. I’ve been thinking this for so long. Why do you think every time we break through critical margin, the price experiences major iv spikes, halts, etc. they then proceed to short us to oblivion because they need to to survive. Any breakthrough of critical margin likely triggers major risk events given their trs exposure. SPY is deteriorating fast, so they either bring GME to zero or blow up. I’ll let you take a guess which way this is heading.

  31. I just want to say, I love you bro!

  32. The "SEC" LMFAO. The "SEC" works for big money my dude. The SEC, that's the funniest shit I've ever heard.

  33. Nice try Ken, I’ll buy some more to be safe

  34. wait....... you're actually saying GME from $4 to $500 wasn't a squeeze!?!?? Holy fuck, what was it then?! Fundamentals changing?! LMFAO

  35. The SEC even admitted it wasn’t a short squeeze. All fomo buying and market makers hedging call options. Cuck Griffen and Frends swappped Melvins bag at better funding that they could afford, but now they buried themselves, 50% of the free float (70 million shares) left and declining fast. Shorts never covered, fuck u pay me suck my balls, I’ll buy and DRS some more GME tm to be safe.

  36. This is idiotic. Many will not donate directly to Tanzania. But if selling merchandise is a means/conduit of philanthropic activity, then we should encourage this. Good on the team for utilizing their fame to do some good.

  37. you actually wrote this with a straight face didn’t you? And thousands of people will read this just as seriously. the retardation here completes me.

  38. I disagree with your retardation. RC was and is only backing one group of INVESTORS and that’s us, not BBBY gamblers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author: admin