This is a difficult one for me bc if SC wins the natty it probably means the defense has improved, and right now my main source of toast is our secondary. Decisions, decisions...
There are people who are all up in arms about bodily autonomy when it comes to women's reproductive systems. But when people speak out against male genital mutilation (circumcision) they just get jokes and derision in return (uncircumcised penises look slightly like an anteater lol).
We need to see if he utterly collapses upon going up against any former Georgia player in the NFL. I still don’t think we’ve figured out how deep that weakness goes.
Easy pick for me. CW13 got all the oohs and ahhs running around, but when he can stay in the pocket he's absolutely deadly. Hitting tight windows and leading receivers so they can catch in stride
Your comment could be interpreted to mean you stopped upholding that standard in your 30s (you probably meant you've upheld it all the way to now, and you're currently in your 30s). They're asking what changed to make you drop that standard.
Guy asks you "What do you mean by that?" in response to something you said? I mean you could start by explaining to him what you meant by what you said and make moves based on the response from there. Might just be crazy enough to work.
Lol wait are you actually serious? Even the jurors who found him not guilty, admitted afterwards they knew he murdered them. Like the jury themselves knew he killed them, they let him go because of how the trial was handled, not because of his actions.
That's what I'm saying. That's a fair trial. Even if you think the defendant did it (not "know" bc only the people who were there could actually know what happened), the jury should acquit if the defense is able to provide reasonable doubt.
Can I ask, what is Peter Parker reasoning for going by Spiderman if he didn't develop organic webshooters when the rest of his powers developed? If his power set is enhanced strength, sticks to stuff, and an awareness of immediate danger, why adopt a spider moniker?
Yup, the standard of proving guilt in a court case like that is "beyond a reasonable doubt." Unfortunately, the LAPD being awful at their jobs was enough to instill reasonable doubt.
This is a difficult one for me bc if SC wins the natty it probably means the defense has improved, and right now my main source of toast is our secondary. Decisions, decisions...
This was literally explained by the OOP in
Kevin's Heart by J Cole. Was crossfaded out my mind the first time I heard it and I like sank into the floor at "Slip me a xanny at once (Somebody!)"
I think it's specifically to represent black and brown members of the LGBT community not just black and brown people in general
What if we remove the fetus, take some skin off it's dick, and put it back in to finish cooking?
Now you're thinking with portals!
I don't get it.
There are people who are all up in arms about bodily autonomy when it comes to women's reproductive systems. But when people speak out against male genital mutilation (circumcision) they just get jokes and derision in return (uncircumcised penises look slightly like an anteater lol).
This is the Yam that manipulated Bill Clinton with desire
Cutting food? How do you eat a fucking steak? What is this list?
Just swallow the meat whole. As the straights do
That first sentence sound pretty gay to me
How is swallowing a large slab of uncut meat gay???
We need to see if he utterly collapses upon going up against any former Georgia player in the NFL. I still don’t think we’ve figured out how deep that weakness goes.
When Nix has to play Philly...
Easy pick for me. CW13 got all the oohs and ahhs running around, but when he can stay in the pocket he's absolutely deadly. Hitting tight windows and leading receivers so they can catch in stride
Tony Toe Tap was HIM
... which I'm playing off of by continuing the reference to the scene in Community that was originally referenced:
They thought you were the Oregon flair, but you were the Stanford flair all along. Big brain moves
Do you mean what did my dad and I do on that summer day in 2000? Or what did I do with the knowledge he bestowed upon me?
Your comment could be interpreted to mean you stopped upholding that standard in your 30s (you probably meant you've upheld it all the way to now, and you're currently in your 30s). They're asking what changed to make you drop that standard.
Why can't I, a guy with no house and 2 good kidneys, come to an agreement with a guy who has 2 houses and no good kidneys?
This has been the opposite of my experience but it's still hilarious
Guy asks you "What do you mean by that?" in response to something you said? I mean you could start by explaining to him what you meant by what you said and make moves based on the response from there. Might just be crazy enough to work.
I'm just not interested in a guy trying to backslide on what he very clearly said "netflix and chill"
There's a way to communicate while not entertaining bs
Elite title iykyk
Thanks for the shout out to the Irish!
On this one thing we agree, domer
I know that pothole! Down by the fair grounds
Nope Woodrow and mill st.
Damn I moved to Byram like a week ago and I'm already outta touch with the city
LeBron getting outplayed by Jose Alvarado in the 4 quarter is wild
But he’s sleeping in your bed
Ima need the whole deck please
And you seem to have missed mine.
That's the problem though, they didn't prove that he murdered them to the standard required.
Lol wait are you actually serious? Even the jurors who found him not guilty, admitted afterwards they knew he murdered them. Like the jury themselves knew he killed them, they let him go because of how the trial was handled, not because of his actions.
That's what I'm saying. That's a fair trial. Even if you think the defendant did it (not "know" bc only the people who were there could actually know what happened), the jury should acquit if the defense is able to provide reasonable doubt.
I'm accepting of all people who wanna enter the dreadlock community. I'll just say it definitely looks better with certain hair types though
Can I ask, what is Peter Parker reasoning for going by Spiderman if he didn't develop organic webshooters when the rest of his powers developed? If his power set is enhanced strength, sticks to stuff, and an awareness of immediate danger, why adopt a spider moniker?
Bit by a spider prolly
Yup, the standard of proving guilt in a court case like that is "beyond a reasonable doubt." Unfortunately, the LAPD being awful at their jobs was enough to instill reasonable doubt.
I just wanna go into this a bit. It's not just that they were "awful at their jobs".
Jackson State vs Southern is a real fun one to go to.
JSU v Acorn is pretty lit too. The level of shit talking is insane
Is a golden hurricane natures version of a golden shower?
It's multiple golden showers at once. Like a category 4 golden hurricane is 4 on 1