graveviolet



























  1. They seem like they projected half of themselves out almost entirely onto to each other, to me. Its not a uncommon dynamic with Heir and Spare but for every responsibile, staid, serious and stocial quality of Elizabeth, Margaret was in equal measure irresponsible, wild, carefree and passionate. We very often in family dynamics form complements to one another, like locks to keys, in order for overall balance to be achieved and our own psyche very often suppresses qualities we perceieve to be wrong, bad, criticised or unwanted in ourselves. They have to exist somewhere, and outside ourselves is the most welcome place for something that is unacceptable to us, and for us, in the case of a young woman thrust into saving the literal monarchy from the instability and danger of abdication. I see them in many ways as two halves of whole, who needed each others qualities to have some sort of balance and indeed were forcing each other to embody those qualities to create such. The codepdendency so often present in human family dynamics is particularly stark and amplified in Royal families due to the incredible hot house pressure they endure as both a family and institution simultaneously.

  2. Could you possibly tell me, if we know, what is the correct way for me to pronounce Nebethet?

  3. First off, I realize it is gross and a massive invasion of privacy to peer into somebody's personal life like this even if it reveals severe character deficits (if true) but holy shit is this fascinating stuff. I can't help myself.

  4. He's never felt particularly emotionally attuned, as a woman. It's not words, or knowledge, it's an energetic feeling. Admittedly I might be particularly aware of it, I've exclusively dated unsually emotionally connected men, but yeah, he doesn't have that particular quality to me, he's more cerebrally attuned I'd say. Which doesn't mean he couldn't be extraordinarily manipulative but I don't think it'd be via emotional attunement. Most men in my experience don't use that well, women typically do.

  5. Idk I very definitely did not think infj and I'm an infj. Too many facial expressions for the majority of infjs I know in photos haha, we all just have the one.

  6. My infj friends say the tell with me is an 'enigmatic' eye expression that makes it look like I know something secret haha

  7. I would argue creating more terrorists is the point. That keeps the money and arms flowing. If the threat were to actually be negotiated down and a solution agreed upon, that would threaten the military industrial complex. Too many people are making way too much money off there being conflict there.

  8. There is very little evidence that this is what creates terrorists.

  9. It gives them lots of ways to keep a place with huge oil reserves polticially unstable and manipulable also. Terror is business.

  10. I assume the people committing genocide who went from the UK would also get the same treatment that this guy is being asked to face

  11. I saw my big 3 twin in a comment section here and replied to them and was like omg we’re twins! They ghosted me but I’m honestly not surprised at all 😂

  12. Note: This is from experience and everyone is different, please let me emphasize this:

  13. This very like me up to the part about support/venting. I am very much present for primarily people's emotional needs, it's probably what my friends most value me for. I can present solutions if it's asked of me but I never go to it first nor consider it the main purpose of the conversation, for me that is largely the remit of others since I have always excelled primarily at understanding peoples emotional needs. I only like conversations with depth, probably because of the former 'Counsellor' role I tend to take in friendships and relationships. I am a Cancer rising and my chart ruler is the moon so perhaps this is why I differ in that one point.

  14. Haha yeah, totally forgot. That “Swayze Stare” can be equally as creepy as it is charming.

  15. It's just intensity, it can translate either way, I think that's what makes even cheesy films with Swayze in, like Point Break, feel like good ones. His intensity carries the audience with it.

  16. Seriously, when did this happen? I thought I remembered him not being that great and suddenly he's amazing in everything I see him in. Either I totally misjudged him or he just got wildly good at some point

  17. Conventional porn is v often a hopless pov for a straight woman. Immersion breaking fake sounds from the women, virtually no noise or pov of the man when he O's etc, you can barely see him much of the time, because he's a self insert for male viewers. That obviously isn't going to work for many hetero females.

  18. Yeah I've always got the impression women don't seek porn out because they see some conventional porn and get put off. Mind you I won't lie, I'm an intensely visual person and I 100% don't need porn, I would choose it over written stuff I don't really find that interesting but my imagination is extremely capable of arousal without anything. Maybe women simply have better imaginations.

  19. And your naïveté worries me. Why do you think politicians have spin doctors? How come there’s so much criticism about access journalism and political bias in the media? American politicians do things every day that would make Camilla blush.

  20. America is a by and large a corporotocracy, if people don't realise how much of the press is in someone's pocket they're out of touch with the nature of the underpinnings of their socio economic strata. Freedom of the pess matters so that someone has the liberty to print what the powerful don't want the public to know, it does not give assurance that much of the press cannot be bought.

  21. I think at the end of the day having been through some health issues myself recently due to complications from surgery. When it comes to your health then public figure or not you are entitled to some privacy. The whole conspiracy theory thing got way out of hand, when she was due back to public life in a few weeks anyway.

  22. Beatrice is a Counsellor of State isn't she? Seems like she'd be the obvious person.

  23. The OG, I remember discovering her when people were comparing Georgia May Jagger to her when she started modelling because of her gap

  24. In French we call this having the teeth of happiness. I always found that kind of delightful!

  25. I knew there was a special French word for it! I couldn't remember what it meant, it's adorable

  26. genuinely - it’s to differentiate the upper class from the lower. ‘educated’ people will know that it’s chumley for cholmondeley, and fanshaw for featherstonehaugh, but poor people won’t. the ‘lower classes’ would generally pronounce things more phonetically, as you would if you’ve only read a word, rather than heard it.

  27. It's a French word, because the British nobility are Norman robber barons. It was originally pronounced with a silent D, Cholmoneley, which got contracted to Chumley by the English when they came here. Their pronunciation is itself a bastardisation of their original word.

  28. I did that one time for a month (with the exception of fruits) and it was ROUGH.

  29. It's super interesting and another reminder for me that my body has very atypical reactions to food. Apparently I might have dopaminergic dysfunction of some kind as I gave up sugar about 8 years ago and have never missed it whatsoever which seems very abnormal going by the comments here.

  30. Yeah it's a title that's been protested for a long time by Welsh nationalists, an uncomfortable one because it represents the pretty brutal suppression of Wales and the murder of the last Welsh Prince Dafydd ap Gruffydd by Edward Longshanks. The title in Welsh is Tywysog Cymru.

  31. She really looks like a heroine of a terror B movie. Stunning!

  32. She feels more oval, but I agree very soft and beautiful. I'm an oval soft featured person and I always felt like I had a lack of 'bone structure' in terms of a strong jaw or cheekbones, it's nice to see all these softer types of beauty celebrated.

  33. Actually there she does look rounder than in the other pics, maybe it was just the angles there. Ugh I wish they wouldn't put actresses under that kind of pressure, I thought we were past it honestly.

  34. The very first place I saw anything about a BBL was Kaiser at Celebitchy instructing her followers on Twitter to spread the BBL rumor. As a "joke" ha ha. Celebitchy has been one of the biggest sources creating and pushing rumors of infidelity, abuse and ED. The Sussex Squad on Twitter occupy the same large chunk of the Venn diagram. It IS the same people.

  35. The one that got me was the submarine. It was relentlessly memed and in that instance we knew the people were likely dying or dead from the off, and the memeing didn't stop even after we knew. That really paused me.

  36. Really? People often told me they're impressed by my knowledge and intelligence, but nobody ever told me they were attracted to me.

  37. Lots of us intuitors are largely sapiosexual tbh

  38. It's on both. Let's not put the blame only on the shitty managment. In the first place the reason why they released the photo was because people were already going off the rails about it. It was just incentivised more because they were like "proven right".

  39. I wasn't aware of it in the early days before the photo but from what I've read it was largely those in the press querying unusual moves from Kensington Palace like responding to the Spanish journalist 'coma' headlines that promoted online speculation in the first place. This was early when the majority of the public apparently were largely unaware, but 'royal watchers' and correspondents noted it was extremely unsual for the Palace to respond to rumours let alone ones generated in other countries. I think the circumstances unfortunately spiralled due to a number of factors that included an ever watchful royal media circuit, a possibly unexpected change of diagnosis, inadvisable PR moves, and the absolutely wildfire nature of memes. People have always gossiped, but once that wasn't something that spread around the world in seconds and that requires a very different strategy and approach when dealing with the complex scenario of being extraordinarily public figures and wanting privacy for a considerable duration of time.

  40. They were definitely a strong influence on the bands who would go onto to form the new romantic scene, but they themselves were considered glam rock. New Romantic would not have existed without them though.

  41. I always think of them more as art rock, but truthfully they spanned so many different types of music they're just as easily glam. A really oddly genre defying band for one that was also very popular, no doubt why they were so influential.

  42. No, because the Royal Family are the representatives of the country. Who you are determines your responsibilities and how much privacy you can get. Like the King or Queen wouldn't be able to disappear just like that, just because they wanted to. They want full privacy? Denounce your titles and responsibility you have towards people of the UK. Btw, now that she had announced the true reason, common folk will leave her alone and respect her privacy, not sure about media tho.

  43. I don’t think there is an escape for them. Look at how The Britisch Media Great Harry and Meghan. They left and get treated badly still

  44. I think some of that is because there is still a BRF, and their connections to it remains. They have a lot still invested in that connection and like anyone who has a 'celebrity' role that continues to support their businesses/careers I think the press will be a role. I believe it would likely take a generation for interest to subside to manageable levels, but with the cessation of the BRF this would undoubtedly happen over time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author: admin