cocoasomething


























  1. Cheap owners: “I hear you, but what if we just raised our ticket prices when Messi is in town instead?”

  2. Or you have the Union owners: “We hear uou, but what if we bought another club”

  3. It'd be better if Hajduk just got kicked out of the tournament, but it's a nice gesture.

  4. Honestly I’d rather they have their own identity instead of B or II tacked on at the end. Wish the Union could have figured out a way to keep their reserve team in Bethlehem.

  5. Could they not have just kept the name but still played in Chester? It wouldn’t be much different than our first team situation

  6. OP, how can city buy the player when he does not have a professional contract with Union?

  7. Honestly I’m not 100% certain. It may be a good faith deal from City? He’s being loaned back to play first team minutes until he turns 18

  8. The guy cant even join City for like 4 years how the fuck is this allowed 💀💀

  9. Sorry if it's been said already but - Is there ONLY a sell on clause - not transer fee?

  10. We get a small fee for him coming from our academy, nothing too significant

  11. We didn’t really sell him, he never had a professional contract with us and he was open to sign with any team. He’s an insanely good prospect that will be able to help us in upcoming years. But the biggest part of this is the sell-on fee. If he pans out his projected ability we could be making big money

  12. He could technically play Saturday, no rules afaik on age restrictions. It’ll br more about when he’s physically ready

  13. Last season started with a Glesnes OG in the 28’… what are the odds on that

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author: admin