Unknown8128


























  1. United can still own the aircraft, and Boeing can still paint them in United livery. The Max 10 has been flying for years. Only natural that customers start taking deliveries   

  2. They can’t take delivery since it isn’t certified yet. Seems like it is a Boeing test flight (hence the callsign) and it’s already painted in United livery

  3. they are replaceable but it’s a bit tricky because they are held in with clips which break very easily. Also, spare parts are often expensive. But you can watch some YouTube videos of people replacing their interior trim and then decide if it’s worth it

  4. Right?! You could drive so much faster without them

  5. no what the heck, they would only realise they have not enough fuel when suddenly the route changes (like recently with the Iranian attack on Israel), weather and all other things are considered before. Also they wouldn’t just realise after like 2,5 hours “oh lol there is fuel missing” and turn around

  6. Can you explain to me why this is awesome? I don’t get it.

  7. If there's an emergency, why would it go all the way back to Paris? The closest airport would've been Bucharest

  8. Probably not an urgent emergency, so it’s better to go back to base since all the parts and mechanics are there

  9. Well it makes a huge difference if you’re like 35 or 20 y.o., soo
 But generally, if you want to fly for a career, I would look into Austrian Airlines Training and the European Fight Academy. Of course you can also get your ATPL privately but with those other two programs you are guaranteed to get a job in the Lufthansa Group (100% sure with EFA, 80% sure with AUA)

  10. not necessarily, but it makes things a lot more difficult

  11. My god, if you don’t buy all of them, contact Sreten from M539 Restorations, he’ll probably have a look!

  12. Not a bad idea but isn’t he based in Germany so they would have to be imported right ?

  13. Yes, but he already imported cars from all over the world, so if there is something he really wants in that shed he will probably still get it

  14. This is the one in Alabama USA, not the original one in the UK.

  15. Someone linked an article which states that it’s Birmingham UK

  16. I guess they will fly to Russia. It’s “just” a pressurisation issue and it’s probably quite complicated for them to divert into a Nato country

  17. If there is an emergency the airspace restriction plays no role.

  18. Of course, but it will still be more complicated. Maybe the aircraft would be confiscated and bringing spare parts and mechanics out there would probably still be a heck of work. And since a standard pressurisation issue is nothing too urgent, it was a way better solution to just go back to Russia. If it was a different, more serious issue, the whole situation would’ve probably developed differently, would be very interesting how that would’ve worked out.

  19. Why do we have so many posts recently that mention some incident that happened years ago. We had the United nose dive, now this.

  20. The technology is here. They’re still jets but Hydrogen jets

  21. they fly those routes everyday. The Final Assembly lines are in Hamburg and Toulouse and they bring parts of the aircraft which are produced on different sites there

  22. Some people seem to know instantly when there are issues with a plane or know planned routes before private planes start. Also I saw a girl talking about listening to communications. I was able to listen to the pilots and tower talking while sitting in the plane in the US, but I have no idea how I could do that here in Europe?

  23. Well, when a plane is having an emergency, there are different aspects that point to a specific problem. For example, if the plane looses altitude fast and is then stable at around a 10.000 feet, that would point to a pressurisation issue. If a plane diverts directly to one of the next airports, even though it’s a small airport with some or none flight activities and the airline doesn’t have a base there, that could point to a more serious mechanical issue. If the aircraft returns to their airlines base, even though it‘s quite far away, it is probable that they have a minor technical issue. If they divert to the next big city with good hospitals, it’s also likely that they have a medical issue on board. Those are all just guesses though and there is no way of confirming those, unless a passenger or the airline posts information online (like on twitter) or you can listen to the ATC. That’s usually possible in the US via LiveATC, but in Europe it’s not allowed.

  24. Ohhh I see, that‘s where knowledge/experience will help you to know what might have happened. How often will the average flightradar stalker see those situations? Thank you for explaining the scenarios!

  25. You mean those emergencies? They happen like a few times a day. The planes squawk 7700 for a general emergency, 7600 for the loss of their radio communication and 7500 for a highjacking. You can get notifications via flightradar whenever a plane squawks one of those codes, you just need to enable this in the settings in the app

  26. Is there a red A330 in the fleet? I was only aware of the 757, A320Neo and A321.

  27. No the 330 fleet only has gold, green and blue. Narrow bodys also have red and yellow

  28. I‘d say medical, but that‘s just a wild guess

  29. I would think (hope?) that this was a ‘forgot to set the brakes’ runaway plane. To activity back it in to all this with a tug is gross negligencez

  30. It was reportedly being tugged without crew and pax

  31. I'm curious how you can identify between the A320 and A321 from this view. Is it the increased wingspan?

  32. Since this is at FRA it’s very likely that this is a Lufthansa plane and you can also see part of their livery in the reflection on the windows. Lufthansa only operates the V2500 on their 321s, all 320s have CFM56. The 320 also all have the Sharklets, while the 321 ceos all have these smaller winglets

  33. Hey, you might want to check out Mentour Pilot‘s videos on YouTube. He explains pretty thoroughly why specific aircraft incidents happened and what went wrong. He usually talks a lot about standard procedures, the engineering that goes into building a plane, all the safety features that stop those incidents from happening and how the aviation industry always thrives to be even safer than it already is. I‘m not a fearful flyer myself, but I read comments of many people with flying anxiety how much these videos helped them to relax and enjoy flying :)

  34. He always puts the stupidest thumbnails on his videos though, pure clickbait. “MH370, HAVE WE FOUND IT!?”, “BOEING MAX, WHAT’S WRONG NOW!?”, etc. it’s unbearable to see someone so well-versed in aviation stoop so low just for the purpose of views.

  35. Lol, yeah, that’s one thing (probably the biggest) that I dislike about his channel. I also watch a few other channels with a very solid viewership that do the same. And honestly, if they came on my feed and I wouldn’t know that their channel was good, I wouldn’t watch it because those thumbnails are a huge turn off

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author: admin