Assuming there is no, or minimal cool down, run a vertical lift from the ground to the top of a tall building, or from the bottom of the gorge to the top.
Do it with pumpkins that are specially bred to be really large, it'll ~50x the energy generation. That'll get you energy production of 200kw. You could maybe sell each kwh for 10 cents, which means OP gets to touch pumpkins for 20 bucks an hour assuming the touched pumpkins are resold for the same amount they were bought for.
No, but in this case, yes. If you're trying to show more guns is worse, you'd want to see an upward climb towards the end, and if you're trying to show more guns is better, you'd want to see it flatten out or decrease towards the end. This basically says the ratio of gun deaths to households with guns is about the same across the board.
So if there were, say, a linear correlation between percent of buildings using asbestos and number of lung cancer deaths, you wouldn't say that more absestos is worse than less asbestos, since the ratio of asbestos use to lung cancer is the same across the board?
Assuming there is no, or minimal cool down, run a vertical lift from the ground to the top of a tall building, or from the bottom of the gorge to the top.
Do it with pumpkins that are specially bred to be really large, it'll ~50x the energy generation. That'll get you energy production of 200kw. You could maybe sell each kwh for 10 cents, which means OP gets to touch pumpkins for 20 bucks an hour assuming the touched pumpkins are resold for the same amount they were bought for.
"why im on bisexual light" moment
"machine, your bisexual check engine light is on"
No, but in this case, yes. If you're trying to show more guns is worse, you'd want to see an upward climb towards the end, and if you're trying to show more guns is better, you'd want to see it flatten out or decrease towards the end. This basically says the ratio of gun deaths to households with guns is about the same across the board.
So if there were, say, a linear correlation between percent of buildings using asbestos and number of lung cancer deaths, you wouldn't say that more absestos is worse than less asbestos, since the ratio of asbestos use to lung cancer is the same across the board?
Yeah but then he would learn about payroll tax among other things and then learn that Google pays more in taxes than he realizes.
Your post has removed as it breaks one or more of the rules outlined in the sidebar.
Your post has removed as it breaks one or more of the rules outlined in the sidebar.
Your post has removed as it breaks one or more of the rules outlined in the sidebar.
Your post has removed as it breaks one or more of the rules outlined in the sidebar.
Your post has removed as it breaks one or more of the rules outlined in the sidebar.
Hello
Hello
Hello
Hello
Hello
Hello