[Pompey] Sixers center Joel Embiid, the reigning MVP, when asked who deserves this season's MVP award. “I’m happy I’m not even in the conversation,” he said. “That conversation has been toxic for a very long time. I’ll be honest, this year is kind of boring. This year, there’s not enough toxicity..
- By - Kimber80
Literally every single night in the NBA someone who missed shots for 3 quarters makes a bunch in the 4th.
Yeah but that’s the MVP…
When he drained those, I then knew the Knicks were going to win.
Wild take.
why did he do that bruh…
The suns wolves game has to end first
They couldn't have put it on ESPN News or something?
Everything ESPN touches goes to shit.
conservatives care what the rich think, so if that 74% includes a majority of his owners then he will, but it probably doesn't, so it won't
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of Israeli politics.
Any good teams to look for?
Bronx Science KM
I haven't been to Mexico City but I'm genuinely curious what puts it leagues ahead of Chicago.
Food. By far.
nah 😭😭
Liberal Arts And Science BD (Eleanor Barrett and Jack Dollinger) and
Peninsula better than both.
AI is such a player lover.
Those arguments are just impact calculus. In the past few years, people have taken to calling it a "framework" or "the role of the ballot," but that almost always means impact calculus. (Sometimes a "role of the ballot" argument is actually about the role of the ballot, but I think I've heard only 1 argument about the role of the ballot all year, despite hearing "the role of the ballot is" in 1/2 of rounds.)
I don’t think this is true at all. Framework is a question of how the judge should procedurally evaluate the content of a debate round. Impact calculus is instruction of how to evaluate the impacts in a round.
It’s toxic, I hate it. It’s toxic, I love it and want more of it.
Why you deconstructing it?
The only time the pullout method doesn’t work is when you don’t pullout. (I’ve successfully used it for a couple of decades at least)
This is just blatantly incorrect.
Death Cult is a traditionally negative argument, though teams have certainly read Baudrillard affs.
Akif my fucking goat 🐐
hello soda
Do they not want to fight because they are against the settlements and war or is it because they're scared?
They believe that Torah study is equally (if not more) as important for Israel as military service.
Check Bronx Science KM or BD wiki from this year or last
Which city/country is this?
Chicago
You got no bids because you haven’t won your bid rounds, but they have. If they’re bad, what does that say about you?
53rd and Third! Great song.
She was never elected, yes, so was Ford. Was he President?
Ford was the elected VP.
actually he wasn’t, he was appointed as a replacement after Agnew resigned in the wake of Watergate, he’s the only person to hold the office of the president for any significant amount of time without ever being elected
Wow, had no idea.
Evicted? You just said they have half the house? What is a fair solution in your opinion
That a single man from Long Island not take over half of a family’s home?
But he’s only there at the behest of the owner of that half of the property?
The owner of that half of the property was awarded it in Israeli court by an order that evicted the family from half of the property, as I’ve detailed.
I and I
When I vote neg on presumption, I generally mean that the aff has failed to carry their initial burden of persuasion by making out a prima facie case for the affirmation of the resolution. Often this happens because the negative points out as an analytic a missing link in the aff's solvency or advantage story and the aff mishandles the response. I think we don't see this in modern policy debate all that often because of a generally held reluctance to vote on terminal defense of any kind in the face of try or die stories.
Which is dumb. Dropped defense is zero risk — it’s a logical corollary of dropped offense is 100% risk.