GretaTheJetta


























  1. How convenient to omit that the reason to want for this is years of the community paying developers to build and them doing close to nothing or delivering 1/10 of the tasks they were paid to do. Only for after that to vanish in the sunset never to be heard again.

  2. That’s called the slippery slope argument

  3. Yeah, which has proven to be valid all throughout history.

  4. Definitely suggest Terrarium. They do a lot for TC and are severely unrecognized on chain.

  5. Actually just checked, and it’s saying 15.3% now. Probably fluctuates with txn volume.

  6. 14.83%, more or less depending on where you look. They burn part of their commission. Support L2s. Admin the validator server for TC. Build applications. And are active in governance and show reasoning behind their votes.

  7. Get ready for tons of shitcoins on terraclassic evm 😅

  8. I’m certainly not telling anyone to buy into meme shit coins. But hey, if they want to then all the better for on chain volume.

  9. While EVM’s are more popular, they also have some inherent flaws that I’m good without.

  10. Well EVM compatibility would just allow those projects to branch into TerraClassic as well.

  11. Bought this on gemini, and it is not trading inline with other exchanges. Difficult to sell now. So disappointed.

  12. Always serves to do research on an asset and it’s exchange trading pair before buying.

  13. Stake with validators than support the chain with development. Burning 51k total coins is pointless.

  14. You understand that they def do more for the chain than most yeah?

  15. Thanks 🙂 in a way, we kind of get the effect of a larger burn tax, but without losing trade volume. That said, it would be at the expense of both the validators and people who stake. This would be mostly at the expense of the validators, unfortunately.

  16. Your best bet is to jump into the validator discord. Terrarium actually partially admins that server. The latest repo releases are posted in their own channel. I think there are recent docs floating around as well.

  17. Ah. Guess I didn't understand the proposal then. Good thing ya had me double check that one

  18. Oh no brother, yeah it’s just a validator I feel needs more support so I promote them.

  19. I mean it's great to see a previously failed coin sitting at #65.

  20. WOW WOOW WOOOOOW! Dont even think of banning timestabloid! I get all my positive lunc newa from them!

  21. None of it is real news. Huffing paint would be more productive than reading those rag articles

  22. They can apply for whitelist as has been stated numerous times. Even HCC has encouraged this and he’s behind the team of devs working now. This is a major reason in for this. They should whitelist and pay no taxes and build. Validating to make money off the delegates is a useless help to the system. They have less delegates so they’re making less money (even after we recklessly cut the validator set down to 100). Build, apply for whitelist and pay no taxes for the dapps. As a validator only, pay your taxes due. We have to as well when we move funds and stake or unstake

  23. So we essentially turn it into a permissioned chain? While potentially drastically cutting all P2P transactions?

  24. Why do people still buy and sell on eth with its fees? Frequently substantially higher than ours

  25. This articles are always trash and entirely wrong. Please down vote these clowns to oblivion so they stop Karma farming.

  26. Desktop version is a PWA app. Navigate to the website and you should be able to download the app from the http bar

  27. I finally did the same thing, and switched over to Galaxy Station Thursday night. I’m also looking for a desktop version of it, but I don’t think it exists yet, which feels like a security issue to me with fake/spoofed URLs and all.

  28. Desktop version is a PWA app. Navigate to the website and you should be able to download the app from the http bar

  29. If you’re using TFLs Terra station, then well, that things riddled with bugs, my dude.

  30. I burned 120,000 in one transaction. 27,000 is like $20 in a week.

  31. Bro. They are 65 on the validator list. Go look at their commission withdraws.

  32. Who the fick is hating. I just said 27000 burn a week is not worth mentioning.

  33. “What you’re doing isn’t even worth mentioning”

  34. Maybe I'm reading this wrong but doesn't seem like they're doing much. They're upping the commissions to 10% but they're only burning 10% of the commissions. Again I could be wrong but kinda reads like they're just forcing customers to burn.

  35. Id say they are doing more than most. They host the Lunc discord with over 10k member for 2 years now. They admin the validator discord. They are building apps giving back to TerraClassic and the community, while also now taking some of their commission and burning it when they are still running the node at a net deficit. They Actually give explanations for their governance votes. They are helping to support layer 2 dapps. They don’t have to be doing any of that at all.

  36. I remembered hearing that there was a burn coming this week or was that just a rumor.

  37. Each exchange has its own separate market. So during times of high volatility or volume, it’s not uncommon for the price differences to happen.

  38. On chain burns are programmed to continue until a total supply of 10b is reached, but to my understanding that’s just a target and it doesn’t necessarily turn off afterwards.

  39. Interesting as the trading volume is high and buys and sells etc accelerate the burn, so being a holder long term is a good strategy.

  40. They are burning a % of their commission weekly. So the more that’s delegated with them, the more gets burned every week.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author: admin