Crewso



























  1. See, this is the good ol fashion jerking I fell in love with

  2. There’s next to no information in this chart… it looks like it heavily weights signing a QB, as the falcons are miles ahead of everyone. Also, why are there only 14 teams listed? Why is the x axis not labeled?

  3. I would imagine it only is showing the teams that “added” value, whereas everyone else theoretically lost value

  4. Oh, that makes sense. Not sure why OP thinks this is a bad thing then 😂

  5. Right. We cut serious cost and got (marginally) better (according to this one writer’s arbitrary ranking off some metric he has). Let the outrage commence.

  6. How does Lawrence have better job security? There are already rumblings that since this is his contract year he has to prove himself worthy of what he was drafted to be. Meanwhile Purdy led them to the Super Bowl last year and might have been able to do it the year before barring injury and there is absolutely 0 talk about replacing him.

  7. There’s almost no way the Jags let Lawerence go. First overall pick that they threw into an absolute shit show with Urban Meyer and who has cobbled back to play good football (worse last year, for sure, but he was dinged up from like week 4 on).

  8. You’ve already got the assets to rebuild. Don’t blow it up any further for the sake of more lottery tickets. Stroud is a bona fide asset who has already shown he can be successful and has a team that’s really starting to build around him. Why cross your fingers that Caleb and whoever you’d get a 1.06 would be as valuable as that?

  9. Right but they have 1.01 and 1.02, they’re getting Caleb

  10. I saw the trade and my first thought was “if you’re a contender, decline, if you aren’t, accept”. After looking at your roster, I’m accepting that trade

  11. Because the title literally says it is based off their NBA careers.

  12. Ur right manu had 13-4-4 they should remove him from the Hall

  13. Lowry has one All NBA team vs Manu’s two, plus Manu is a four time champ. Let’s not act like those two were the same

  14. Guarantee only it’s an 8 man with 3 active teams

  15. You can see OP has pick 1.12, so obviously a 12 team league. And who knows how active, OP has an absolute beast of a team and assets, but not impossible for them to have this in an active league

  16. I’d embrace a fire sale/youth movement. Your team just doesn’t have a championship window imo. I’d hang onto Addison but otherwise field offers for any other skill position player in a deal that includes prospects and/or draft capital. Your QB situation is nice but if you don’t start building a foundation of young, sustainable skill position talent, it won’t matter.

  17. but on offense? theres like 10 guys in the league that are taking the kind of shots shes taking. and her vision is impressive as well. i know she would 100% struggle on defense but id like to see her in an nba offense.

  18. On offense, she would get absolutely clamped down. Again, no disrespect to her, women are just inherently less athletic than men. For the same reason that world class female sprinters would lose to the men’s high school national champion sprinters every year, Caitlin would be locked down night in, night out

  19. Yeah exactly, unless she’s getting some real ‘Draymond’ level illegal screens, she’s never realistically getting a chance to even get open enough to attempt a shot, and once she releases that ball it’s getting swatted into the fuckin stands

  20. She couldn’t possibly set Draymond screens because she is 6’0 ft 154 lbs, there just isn’t a path to her doing anything

  21. Huh, Charles Barkley has been on National TV for like 20 years, no one has ever accused him of being polished, I wonder why he gets a pass? Maybe because talent is talent?

  22. What are you talking about play by play vs color commentator? Neither Pat, Chuck, or SAS are people I would classify as either of those things. Sure, they have done color commentary, but they are better known as presenters/analysts, which is the context of what we’re talking about

  23. Sean Payton does. Not really disagreeing with your point just responding to the “if any.”

  24. The “if any” part was referring to baseball and basketball

  25. Not entirely true hahah, they would continually get dead time and go to the back to discuss random shit. That is basically all the time we saw Zito in. The only time I’ve heard his voice in the last 8 months is maybe 3 “bear dahns”

  26. It’s Super Bowl week, how much dead time do they have to discuss random shit? It’s literally their busiest week, where guests can pop on completely at random at any time. This feels like complaining just for the sake of complaining.

  27. I love PMS don’t get me wrong I usually LOVE the popping in Super Bowl week (as expressed in my original post) but really what caught me was the multiple times today he went back to the studio saying “sorry boys we should’ve got you a question there”. I know it’s hectic and I honestly love Radio Row with everyone popping out, I just wish we could get some questions from the back from guys that don’t get the chance to ask everyday.

  28. Just seems like you’re whining about a nothingburger

  29. Okay.. so you got disowned for $50? Also, what made you win $50? Going 4-11 isn’t that good. 15 week regular season doesn’t make sense either.

  30. Do you legitimately think any part of this is real 🤣

  31. Can’t hurt, but you aren’t going to be getting anywhere quickly if you just focus on 10k steps and not dieting. Diet, and COUNT THE CALORIES. Cannot emphasize how big a difference this makes, at least for me. There are plenty of apps that make it pretty damn easy to keep track of what you eat. I personally use MyFitnessPal, but there are more than a few. So much less likely to overeat when you track how much you’ve had, and has basically killed snacking for me.

  32. Has Pat allowed it to really change the show? Not really except for cursing. The show has stayed largely the same. The viewpoint of pat hasn’t changed he still shits on ESPN shows that go by the block boring ass shit.

  33. Stop arguing with these guys, they’re just trolls trying to stir shit up, just leave them alone

  34. Pretty sure he didn’t just stop coming on the show end of week 18, the last few years though.

  35. If I recall correctly, for the most part once his team was eliminated, he was gone until around the draft for the odd call or two, last year was an exception because of the whole will he/wont he retirement stuff

  36. Entirely besides the point. The narrative leading into the move to ESPN was that Pat was a sellaht and the show would never be the same. Not only has the show largely been the same, some of the things he has done with being on campus for Gameday (the JMU show was pure electricity) have been better than what he could have done on his own.

  37. One would assume that if you think Pat made ESPN better, then you think on some level you think ESPN is good. Which it isn’t. It’s awful.

  38. lol, what an absurd take. You ain’t worth arguing with, enjoy your Saturday ya clahn

  39. This is you just pulling stuff out of your ass. This isn’t ESPN as an entity, this is just one guy who doesn’t like Pat being an anonymous source.

  40. Because if they're doing illegal shady shit they deserve to be called out for it. People who are a few days behind on their rent can't afford to go to court and landlords know this

  41. Ok that’s all well and good but even if this was illegal, it wasn’t happening to OP, you can’t just arbitrarily sue people on behalf of other people

  42. They are thinking of others besides themselves. Is that such a weird concept?

  43. From the standpoint of OP not having anything for which to bring action against their landlord, yes, it is weird.

  44. All opinions aside, is the point of this post talk shit on people with a different opinion than you?

  45. Bud, if this post offends you, you’re Charmin soft, this post isn’t rude at all

  46. Nope - you missread the article. The school where he was doing his student teaching was happy to have him do it virtually. They have virtual physical education classes. It was the degree-granting institution which insisted that he wasn't good enough.

  47. I believe they were referring to the university not having to alter the student teaching aspect of their course, not the school the student was trying to teach at altering their PE class

  48. lol no, you were trying to be snarky about it, which is why you made the comment about the NFC pro bowl team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author: admin